is there anything nontrivial here? I guess we are now allowed to write "topological" before anything in FOL and have it make sense similarly things with some kind of symmetry
ok i guess we may need coproducts as well to express disjunctions "either x has a multiplicative inverse or x is 0" not sure the reals are a "topological field" in this sense though or we have to settle for a rather more resticted set of FOL objects