One of the most edifying outcomes to the New Atheism moment is that a certain minority of mature participants got practical demonstration of how it's frequently counterproductive to engage with a hyper-technical debate in front of a nontechnical audience. A lot of bookish elder millennials know that slogans and enthusiasm may very well carry the day, so it's better to keep your metaphorical powder dry until you can actually get a clean shot. You don't have to attend every fight you're invited to
Y'know Beria was quite a reliable technocrat but then again there was all the other stuff
The number of people who never watch sports is more than double the number of people who watch sports multiple times a week.
In 2021, 33% of US poll respondents said they never watch sports. The majority, 51%, watch sports once a month or less.
I wish there were a filter I could apply to my web/adspace stuff to indicate that I have never cared and will never care about any sport whatsoever.
It's weird to me that "being a spectator for sport X" is still considered a general preference. I think the data indicate that those preferences were mostly falsified by normies looking to go along and get along during the mass media age. Now that people have good, cheap, abundant media, spectator sports are going the way of disco.
"They've got you on tilt" is a real improvement over "You've been baited." "Baiting" implies that the real effects of trolling are directly controlled by the troll, whereas "on tilt" implies that the trollèd is responsible for most of the malfunctioning -- further revealing that rational, self-respecting conduct is a precarious point of stasis.
Humanist interested in the consequences of the machine on intellectual history.