The Ortega hypothesis posits that science progresses through the accumulation of narrow, modest, specialized findings.
It seems a fairly unobjectionable elaboration to argue that publication bias is a major cause of friction preventing the accumulation of modest and mundane findings behind leading research programs.
I propose that publication bias is a major drag force preventing the emergence of experimental consensus.
THE VVEST VSED TO STAND FOR FINE ART
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9Fr1MlnpSk
Nice argument. However, I have already depicted myself as the interplanetary revolutionary and you as a Nazi cannibal:
https://youtu.be/BFvEnT4GbdM?si=ef1OL9TvimttkAF4
Even if every human turned off every machine and disappeared overnight tonight, we have already caused a geologically significant extinction for the only known life-source in the universe
Humanist interested in the consequences of the machine on intellectual history.