To be clear, I think that writers should have something like a "no zero days" standard, if it can be humanely implemented, but I believe such a thing is basically irrelevant to the breakthrough capacity of some writers to massively overproduce.
I am coming around to the view that 10x variance is possible in writers, but it has less to do with the ability to avoid left-tail variance ("no zero days") and more to do to the ability to capture windfalls from right-tail variance.
Psychopaths are about 4.5% of the general adult population:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374040/
Honest to God, I can tell you specific colonies in colonial New England that had better "level 1" literacy than the contemporary USA. Those are the same colonies that established public schools because they believed Satan was tricking them into Catholicism.
So if I hand seven people from my state a sheet of paper that simply says, "If you ask me for money right now I will give it to you," six of them will get it and one will not.
15% of adults in my state can't retrieve a single piece of information from a basic document written in simple vocabulary.
We have had public schools in this state for 159 years.
" Social controls intensify in service of a vague and predictable resentment. Decorum is endlessly renegotiated. New forms of authority and litigiousness come to dominate human affairs and yet hold to no positive law. The young person is given the choice between participation in this stilted pantomime of discourse on the one hand and resigned disengagement on the other."
"... emotions [must] be cauterized at the source. To be mature now is to fend off any incursions of the world on the self. The central task of the therapeutic system is to suspend this state indefinitely, to manage an increasingly feeble impetuousness of life"
"A strange new ethic of detachment is emerging: one must never allow oneself to feel, to commit, to sin or to repent, to stake one’s ground. Options must remain open. As the structures which have lent direction to the individual fall away—civil society, family, courtship, apprenticeship, citizenship, patronage, education, belief—the self is at once bared to the world and made limp. Masks drop, relations flatten—and the walls around the heart and mind draw tight in defense."
Humanist interested in the consequences of the machine on intellectual history.