@petealexharris @cstross It's true. A running joke amongst my peers is that any AI news headline can replace "AI" with "capitalism" and remain 100% true.
Copied from twit space:
—————————-
Man goes to doctor. Says he is CEO of AI startup but has no idea how to become profitable.
Doctor says solution is simple. Advanced model GPT-4 is in town. Ask it how to profit, and it will surely know the answer.
Man bursts into tears. “But doctor” he says “you are GPT-4”
—————————-
I don't think I _HAVE_ a like button. The star icon in my Mastodon instance is labeled "Favourite", which implies that it saves it for my own use, not that it is visible to anyone else.
@cstross
It's an interesting question of how to test systems that only have extremely infrequent (we hope) use.
I can argue that there are ZERO emergencies where I want my phone to interrupt me. But if there are some that I want, I think I have to accept that I'll suffer more tests to know if and how it works than actual emergencies.
This came to me from a trans friend I know really, really well. For years now. And from that, I can tell you that there actually is a trans agenda. And it is this:
To walk through the world without getting their rights, bodies, and lives taken and attacked by people who hate them for no reason at all.
That’s it.
To safeguard our performance, we are making a number of conservative changes to our staffing model. The vast majority of our Trolley Track Switching Engineers will be impacted, with no fewer than 3 remaining to oversee switching needs on our infrastructure.
We are also sorry to say goodbye to our Track Switching Ethics team, who have made significant impact on our practices worldwide. We wish all impacted resources the best in their future careers.
“The reason most public transportation is seen as ‘losing’ money is precisely because it charges for trips. If you don't charge fares, suddenly it can't ‘lose’ money. It just costs money, the same as the roads.”
This random comment has given me my new favourite argument for removing fares from public transit.
@timbray
There's an underlying contradiction there - if the choice doesn't matter, then why force someone to make it? If it does matter, then that difference needs to be explicit.
The FreeBSD Journal asked me to write about filesystems?
"First off, understand that storage devices are lying liars that lie. The newest solid state storage maintains a malformed compatibility with hard drives released in the previous century, which were built on standards designed for punch cards, which had their roots in 17th-century looms and the Luddites, so every time you plug in a storage device you’re putting someone out of work but there’s no ethical data storage under capitalism so go for it."
They might complain, but what did they *expect* I would say?
Just this guy, you know?