reminder to self: resolve whether actually all of so-called "randomness" or "many-worldedness" in physics is a result of "incompressible logic". I'm torn btn finding this lecture completely baffling or utterly mundane. mby it's utterly mundane but its implications are huge? prob neither. noting this down bc I didn't expect myself to become uncertain abt many-worlds-interpretation based on a *wishy-washy lecture on logic*. WHAT THE HECK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owHuDGMLk5s&list=PL86ECDEDE3FA8D8D1&index=6
Follow
tbc, I haven't processed this at all. I just needed to make a salient note to myself bc I'm in a hurry, and don't want to forget my uncertainty abt this. huge-if-true but still v unlikely.
