The problem with prediction markets is deciding the outcome. If you base it on an authority's decision, your market is a market on in the authority is captured by liars.

@WomanCorn I like thinking about mechanisms which don't require an authority's resolution, or allow for easily-viewable observables which in theory everyone should have access to.

Follow

@WomanCorn Like, it seems likely to me if you just make a prediction market, and tell people to sell the stock when they think the event specified is less likely, and buy it when they think its more likely, this produces a consensus around what others are going to do, and still lets the stock be coupled to the resolution criteria without needing an authority to resolve anything themselves.

@WomanCorn Or you can have arbitration procedures for if a resolution firm doesn't resolve the market the way expected, like how we have arbitration procedures for medical malpractice.

@D0TheMath this is interesting. It seems to leave the possibility for cranks to keep the market alive well after it should naturally close. I don't know if that's a bug or a feature.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one