@nyrath well that sucks. It's such a good concept.

@swope @nyrath Well, it'd be better to design satellites with the capability for refueling from the start. Ideally, get together a single standard, so a refueling infrastructure is possible.

I mean, imagine today's gasoline automobile infrastructure if everyone had to partially dismantle their vehicle and use custom pump nozzle adapters to refuel every time. That's nonsense, right?

@isaackuo @swope

Yes but as you know establishing a standard is a savage brutal process nowadays. The corporations agree that standards are needed, but the corps want their solution adopted by everyone else. VHS vs Betamax et al.

@isaackuo @swope

Work appears to have stalled on the Universal Space Interface Standard. The last news I heard about that was 2014.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Univer

@nyrath @isaackuo "universal" feels especially bold when you are exploring the universe.

@swope @nyrath Our civilization is the one which came up with "Universal" Serial Bus ... A ... B ... C ... mini-B ... micro ... USB3 ...

@isaackuo @swope

About 20 years ago I had a thick book full of hundreds of variations of the RS-232 "standard". A real standard would have zero variations.

@nyrath @swope Okay, okay, but at least they didn't call RS-232 "universal".

I _thought_ the idea behind Universal Serial Bus was that it'd be a little bit painful in the short term to switch all serial devices to this new standard, but at least it'd be one and done.

Follow

@isaackuo @nyrath @swope

xkcd is, as always, relevant:

xkcd.com/927/

(Although, to be fair to USB, at least USB 4.0 culls the proliferation in connectors down to Type-C only and keeps backcompat to USB 1.0, so it's doing a lot better than most 30-year-old standards so far... 😊)

@cerebrate @isaackuo @nyrath is this USB-C using Thunderbolt 3, 4? Or USB 3.2 gen 2x2?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one