the trick is to have two interpretations, one that's true and trivial, and another that's false and big-if-true. a motivated reasoner can then read it as a combination of the two interpretations: borrow the truthiness from A and the big-if-true from B.
@kokogiac what Dennett calls a "deepity".
the trick is to have two interpretations, one that's true and trivial, and another that's false and big-if-true. a motivated reasoner can then read it as a combination of the two interpretations: borrow the truthiness from A and the big-if-true from B.