i dislike the way most people deal with QRI stuff

sure, they're kind of out there, man, but i'd like it if people were critiquing individual points

e.g. my opinions

* stv is ~correct: 10%
* log scales of pain & pleasure is correct: 85%
* this has huge implications: 65%
* neural annealing is a good framework for the brain: 50%
* neural annealing is correct, in all of the aspects they say: 1% (come on! it's a *huge* conjunction!)
* tyranny of intentional object is right: 90%