after all, don't we have an obligation to consider every possible explanation for phenomena, to be open minded?
no! we absolutely do not! and by making that choice explicitly, we exchange options for power
willingly taking on constraints is a pro move
---
RT @pee_zombie
critically important to consider: the cognitive value of putting questions to rest
fully committing to certain courses of action, discretizing your confidence, allow…
https://twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/1367198355944857600
in many senses, it's an irrational one. from an epistemic risk management perspective, it's the wrong choice; a sort of metaphysical Faustian bargain
a bargain made at the altar of reason itself; which do you value more, robustness or incisiveness? ultimately you must choose.
personally, I'm a bit of a risk-taker in this domain; I'm willing to accept the possibility of creating cognitive blind spots in exchange for gaining the ability to really plumb the depths of our cosmological uncertainty
for many others, it's the wrong choice, which is fine!