causality is backwards; we'd have fewer pets if fertility was higher
---
RT @robinhanson
Would fertility be higher if we didn't have pets? twitter.com/AlexNowrasteh/stat
twitter.com/robinhanson/status

Follow

similarly, pets are an attractive but ultimately toxic replacement for the real deal

---
RT @forshaper
One cannot be against porn as superstimuli and be for pets (as indoor pets are in North American homes) without being inconsistent.
twitter.com/forshaper/status/1

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one