all choices are trade-offs between sets of problems you'd rather have; there is no optimization free lunch.

when we talk of freedom, we mean the ability to choose the set of constraints you'd rather be bound by

people differ in how they use the word "freedom"; some mean "freedom from nature", achieved by binding oneself w/ the covenants of civilization

others mean "freedom from others", binding you to the yoke of entropy instead

neither choice is superior

---
RT @0x49fa98
Masculine freedom isn't freedom from constraints, it's MORE constraints. It's the covenant between you and nature or nature's god to abide by his laws. But most can't make t…
https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/status/1444000094982967315

we live in a society; as such, you can never truly achieve freedom from others

the universe is finite; as such, you can never truly achieve post-scarcity

every choice involves a balancing act

---
RT @pee_zombie
as the total amount of energy in the universe seems to be finite, & entropy is conserved, this is necessarily only a postponing of the halting state; at some point there will not be enough free energy left to combat the ceasel…
https://twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/1393631101529243649

predominantly, this choice of freedoms seems to be a zero-sum game; everyone dies in the end, no matter how you live

but by looking to the future and envisioning it to be better than the present, we can create the illusion of hope, helping us adapt

---
RT @pee_zombie
that is, of course, unless we are able to solve the ultimate problem of maximal entropic equilibrium, aka heat death, the terminal state for all sub-cosmic systems. this …
https://twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/1393632412236750855

this is not grim, for an illusion of hope is all we can achieve; possibilities cannot be reified; at least, not in the present. when we talk of hope, we talk of virtualities, of the asymptotes we want to strive for

through this striving transcendence of circumstances is achieved