twitter xp
never understood the whole celebrity attraction thing but am beginning to realize a parasocial relationship entails a phantom of the same intimacy that makes someone you know well so much more attractive than a rando
twitter xp
take two people who look identical, but you have slightly more knowledge on the internal world of one of them; guarantee you'll be more attracted to them
those extra few bits give you a higher resolution model, and hence an increased ability to imagine y'all in situations
twitter xp
counterparty simulation is a core pillar of consciousness, one of the primary activities it developed to enable
as such, we naturally seek out information on features of our social reality
---
RT @pee_zombie
human communication, and more generally communication btwn sentient agents, is capable of utilizing a rather unique type of error-correction: counterparty simulation
a little model of us lives rent-free in the minds of those who…
https://twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/1466444778791387138
twitter xp
the one-directional aspect of parasocial relationships doesn't factor into their relevance; a modern celebrity is comparable to someone at the top of your local status hierarchy, in that they appear equally inaccessible, and yet everyone is inevitably measured against them
twitter xp
to make sense of the dynamics & dark matter of any social group, one needs only to note the axes along which their celebrities excel; the local games will reward excellence in those domains
twitter xp
the topmost stratum of your social spheres determines the local dimensions of salience, as values are differential across groups; a society with the physically impressive at the top plays radically different dominance games than one with the intellectual or cultural