@ppng OK, simple example for you. A man can chop down a lot more trees with an axe than with his bare hands. Thus, whoever made the axe played a role in the production of those logs. The reason they were able to make an axe is that someone, somewhere, chose to not immediately consume all the wealth they produced, but set some of it aside (capital formation) so it could be used to create 'produced means of production'.

Follow

@ppng The investor isn't 'appropriating' anything, just receiving the rewards due to him for having produced without consuming (and thus contributed more *to* society than he took *from* it. Money & equity are just tools we use to account the difference between the two).

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one