Corn Woman 🌽 @WomanCorn@schelling.pt
Okay, I have now seen two people say that the second half of _Gurren Lagann_ was so disappointing to them that it ruined the series.
I am baffled by this. Can anyone explain?
With the latest OGL walk back, I think it's important to remind people that claiming revocation ability, but only to prevent racists from using it it a trap that still allows revocation.
The Open Source community dealt with this question years ago. It's not an open license.
@Lady_Euromutt I dunno. Have you written any good SciFi?
Corn Woman 🌽
boosted
What is true is already so.
Owning up to it doesn't make it worse.
Not being open about it doesn't make it go away.
And because it's true, it is what is there to be interacted with.
Anything untrue isn't there to be lived.
People can stand what is true,
for they are already enduring it.
https://www.lesswrong.com/s/5bZZZJ5psXrrD5BGb/p/HYWhKXRsMAyvRKRYz
Corn Woman 🌽
boosted
• 1990: BBSes
• 1995: Usenet newsgroups
• 2000: Email discussion lists
• 2005: Web forums
• 2010: LiveJournal communities
• 2015: Reddit subreddits
• 2020: Discord groups
• 2025: Scratching around in the wastelands for scavengeable supplies and a way for it all to maybe begin to make sense again
Corn Woman 🌽
boosted
Aaron Swartz died ten years ago today January 11, 2013. Let's all take a moment to remember him and all that he did. #RememberAaronSwartz
Corn Woman 🌽
boosted
Paizo (publishers of Pathfinder) react to rumors of Wizards of the Coast moving from the existing Open Game License to a new, predatory license and attempting to somehow retroactively revoke the old license: https://paizo.com/community/blog
The punchline: Paizo previously used the OGL to release their original content because it was there; now they feel it is no longer trustworthy so they're making their own license.
The name: The Open RPG Creative License (ORC).
Corn Woman 🌽
boosted
@gherhartd The trigger is, no doubt, the OGL 1.1 leaks.
As for why new licenses, I wouldn't be surprised if many of them literarily don't know about licenses other than the OGL.
Woo. I am having a real one.
Expected for this time of year, but with the additional stress going on it's pretty rough rn.
Hug your kids.
@lispegistus Upon learning this, I'm having a much stronger disgust reaction than I would have predicted.
I'm really kind of baffled about the OGL 1.1 fracas, because so much of it seams to be about VTTs and Twitch streams, which do not feature in my RPG hobby in any way.
Did these things really become so important for today's D&D?
Waiting for the #TwitterFiles expose on #GamerGate.
Not sure what's worse, the people unable to see context and saying <wow, that's bad>, or the people unable to see context and saying <wow, that's good>.
I'm just going to start calling it "cheek amputation" in hopes that the name will catch on and gross people out so they stop doing it.
The current OGL 1.1 fracas reminds me of this thread from The Forge: http://indie-rpgs.com/archive/index.php?topic=5109.0
They question if d20 supplements count as "indie" by their definition (Creator owned: Ip and publishing rights,) and conclude they are.
No one considered OGL revocation.
