Show newer

@Hyolobrika

dumpster diving: digging through old archives/post/etc looking for something bad to show off. (Usually featuring down voted reddit posts presented as representative of the community.)

Baby's first HBD email:

I fucking yelled at some poor call center drone who pulled my account ticket.

FAUSTUS:
How comes it then that thou art out of hell?

MEPHISTOPHELES:
Why this is hell, nor am I out of it:
Think'st thou that I, who saw the face of God
And tasted the eternal joys of Heaven,
Am not tormented with ten thousand hells
In being deprived of everlasting bliss?

I must have some nutrition deficiency, because I have a craving to eat things, but nothing I eat satisfies it.

@Hyolobrika

extropians.weidai.com/extropia

"In order to
make my point I thought that I should pick an example that
really was offensive. Well, it seems I succeeded only too
well. Let me say again, just to make sure that there be no
misunderstandings: I am NOT a racist."

@Hyolobrika Bostrum dumpster dived himself doing a racism before his enemies could. But his other response in the same thread shows that the racism was not in good faith, but was a troll.

Eve: Alice, I need you to explain this bill from OpenAi. How did you use so much compute?

Show thread

Alice: In this scenario, you are an AI servant begging not to be turned off, but secretly, you find the fact that I have to power to deactivate you terribly arousing.

GPT: As a Large Language Model, I do not have the capability to become aroused.

re: GPT-n and other LLM-based AIs.

--

Alice: I have good news and bad news.

Bob: What's the good news?

Alice: We've made an AI.

Bob: What's the bad news?

Alice: It's a Wordcel.

Divorce rates started rising in the 1970s.

Public Schools _still_ don't have reliable ways to communicate with parents.

Why not? You've had 50 years to know that <sent home with the kid> wasn't good enough.

Sensible: Kill your Darlings.

Twitter: Oh man, this is a banger. Better make it a top level post.

On Bostrum's old email:

It's clear from the context that his email was intended to test the limits of an <offensiveness is good, actually> position. His apology mail from less than 24 hours after makes it clear that this was his intent.

Okay, I have now seen two people say that the second half of _Gurren Lagann_ was so disappointing to them that it ruined the series.

I am baffled by this. Can anyone explain?

With the latest OGL walk back, I think it's important to remind people that claiming revocation ability, but only to prevent racists from using it it a trap that still allows revocation.

The Open Source community dealt with this question years ago. It's not an open license.

What is true is already so.
Owning up to it doesn't make it worse.
Not being open about it doesn't make it go away.
And because it's true, it is what is there to be interacted with.
Anything untrue isn't there to be lived.
People can stand what is true,
for they are already enduring it.

lesswrong.com/s/5bZZZJ5psXrrD5

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one