Show newer

With the latest OGL walk back, I think it's important to remind people that claiming revocation ability, but only to prevent racists from using it it a trap that still allows revocation.

The Open Source community dealt with this question years ago. It's not an open license.

What is true is already so.
Owning up to it doesn't make it worse.
Not being open about it doesn't make it go away.
And because it's true, it is what is there to be interacted with.
Anything untrue isn't there to be lived.
People can stand what is true,
for they are already enduring it.

lesswrong.com/s/5bZZZJ5psXrrD5

• 1990: BBSes
• 1995: Usenet newsgroups
• 2000: Email discussion lists
• 2005: Web forums
• 2010: LiveJournal communities
• 2015: Reddit subreddits
• 2020: Discord groups
• 2025: Scratching around in the wastelands for scavengeable supplies and a way for it all to maybe begin to make sense again

Aaron Swartz died ten years ago today January 11, 2013. Let's all take a moment to remember him and all that he did. #RememberAaronSwartz

Paizo (publishers of Pathfinder) react to rumors of Wizards of the Coast moving from the existing Open Game License to a new, predatory license and attempting to somehow retroactively revoke the old license: paizo.com/community/blog

The punchline: Paizo previously used the OGL to release their original content because it was there; now they feel it is no longer trustworthy so they're making their own license.

The name: The Open RPG Creative License (ORC).

Woo. I am having a real one.

Expected for this time of year, but with the additional stress going on it's pretty rough rn.

Hug your kids.

I'm really kind of baffled about the OGL 1.1 fracas, because so much of it seams to be about VTTs and Twitch streams, which do not feature in my RPG hobby in any way.

Did these things really become so important for today's D&D?

Not sure what's worse, the people unable to see context and saying <wow, that's bad>, or the people unable to see context and saying <wow, that's good>.

I'm just going to start calling it "cheek amputation" in hopes that the name will catch on and gross people out so they stop doing it.

The current OGL 1.1 fracas reminds me of this thread from The Forge: indie-rpgs.com/archive/index.p

They question if d20 supplements count as "indie" by their definition (Creator owned: Ip and publishing rights,) and conclude they are.

No one considered OGL revocation.

Last week, Gizmodo's Linda Codega caught a fantastic scoop - a leaked report of #Hasbro's plan to revoke the decades-old #OpenGamingLicense, which subsidiary #WizardsOfTheCoast promulgated as an allegedly #open sandbox for people seeking to extend, remix or improve #DungeonsAndDragons:

gizmodo.com/dnd-wizards-of-the

1/

Long thread/11 

Crucially, the deal is silent on whether Deere will supply the tools needed to activate VIN locks, meaning that farmers will still be at Deere's mercy when they effect their own repairs.

What's more, the deal itself *isn't legally binding*, and Deere can cancel it at any time. Once you dig past the headline, the Deere's Damascene conversion to repair advocacy starts to look awfully superficial - and deceptive.

11/

Show thread

she is reading the world's #1 bestselling horror novel

Oh God.

There's a _Nier: Automata_ anime airing. That means my timeline will be full of horny fan art of 2B.

Radical Libertarians are poised to repeal all regulation. You have discovered a strange thaumaturgical/legal loophole that will allow you to ban one thing and have it stay banned.

What is the one thing you ban?

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one