you might be thinking: “aha! so I should vote in elections, since even though under do()-calculus, the decision has a miniscule impact, there are many agents that are logically correlated with me, which means my influence is much higher!” A tiny problem is that the number of agents that are logically correlated because they base their decisions on logical correlation is, ah, not *that* big…

Follow

@niplav Counterpoint: Every fancy game&/decision theory idea is something your grandma thought was obvious

@ajvermillion the midwit oscillation is real

So maybe you can do worse by trying?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one