So I saw a post recently elsewhere:

> 300 'smart' devices all around you, collecting data from all aspects and angles, working together to decipher your personality and preferences... just to put it on the open market for $0.10

People keep saying this like it's a bad thing.

The only bad thing about it is that it will cost $0.10, whereas I, being _homo economicus_, want my preferences on the open market for free. I might even be willing to pay a small amount to make people take and use them.

Preference-satisfiers knowing what your preferences are is, like, the first and most necessary step in them being able to satisfy your preferences.

Why in the name of Moloch's granite cock would you ever want the world to be _less_ able to satisfy your preferences?

I mean, you do you, since you hiding your preferences while I expose mine means that statistically the world will be aligned a little bit closer to me and further away from you, and you probably have shit taste because you're not me. So good for me, I guess.

But I nonetheless have a strong preference for reminding everyone that making it harder for the world to become a better place is unsane behavior.

@cerebrate spoken like someone who has never been in danger from the government because of what they were

@zarpaulus When you have shared the experience of being dragged from your bed at machine-gun point by the Feds - prompted by your suspicious data trail - you may then presume to make that argument to me.

Not before.

@cerebrate I think we both know that had your skin been darker or your sexuality less conventional, you’d likely be dead or in prison

@zarpaulus

I think we both also know you’re heading off on a tangent of dubious relevance at least twice over, too.