Curling is the sport of high human development countries because the fundamental activity of play requires a cultivation of fingerspitzengefuhl adequate to the chaotic interaction of micro-friction. Such a cultivation is time-intensive and emerges from environments that support similar fingerspitzengefuhl kinds of human development, such as open heart surgery or mastery of the violin.
Only the fully free and flourishing individual may truly respond to his or her fingertips' feeling.
"Thank you for expressing your engagement with our brand. We have not professionally contracted that particular influencer to connect with our products, but this is exactly the kind of organic, viral engagement that we see every day from across the web. People just love connecting with our brand, Terrorism™️."
7. Curling seems pretty receptive to mixed-gender competition. Tonight I played against a pregnant woman.
3. Curling is the sport of high human development countries because of some reason I haven't finished making up yet.
2. The basic conflict engine for curling is derived from the obscure frictional effects of a technique applied to ice called pebbling. Pebbling is the application of fine water droplets to the ice in order to create minor, random imperfections.
1. Curling is for people who like the clacky sounds from croquet but wish they were chonkier.
College yoga instructor: "You sit wrong. What you're doing is not sitting up straight. Go home and practice sitting."
Reddit comment: "When the knees are higher than the hips, shortness in the back of the pelvis or the hip joints tips the pelvis posteriorly and tips the weight of the body backward. To maintain balance and prevent falling, the spine rounds into flexion. When the hips are raised higher than the knees, the pelvis tips anteriorly and the weight tips forward. This allows for..."
My counter to both would be:
A. What if you're just a weird lil freak? and what if that's fine?
B. What if the conceptual basis for your entire inner life was arbitrarily assembled without any long-term interest in efficacy? and what if the people who made up "the rules" don't really give a shit about you?
Humanist interested in the consequences of the machine on intellectual history.