I've also got a pattern of annoying the shit out of low-openness nurses. Conscientious and extroverted people, to be sure, but they're not used to dealing with a person like me who runs on high-octane speculative thinking.
I once happened to share a social circle with a stone-cold narcissist, and he seemed mildly annoyed whenever I existed in the same room as him. I try to be friends with literally every person I meet, but this narcissist dude acted genuinely disgusted by me.
An interesting thing about Cosmo is that my appeal fits tightly into certain demographics:
* people with cluster-B disorders treat me like half-chewed cat food. They have no interest in me at all.
* people who follow me on Mastodon tend to be intensely high-IQ, highly attractive, and extremely sexually gifted
Dispatches on this: I didn't know how difficult Luhman is as a writer. He's got this common disease of German academics to assume that you're already clued into his conversation. But reader -- I am not clued into his conversation.
Good shitposts come out of provocation, and there's always a little bit of insight communicated in effective provocation. Unless you're dril, it's hard for a poster to access that insight without betraying some trace of sincerity. The normal failure-states for shitposters are an excess of sincerity (EG gimmick accounts dropping the bit to repeat a slogan) or self-betrayal, which amounts to a loss of insight.
Yesterday I was hanging out with some new friends and we briefly slipped into the sub-topic of how insane the 07-10 period was. There's a demographic band of people who had to search for employment during that period who have a bone-deep sense of how bad things can really get. I just cannot stress this enough. For years, everything I applied for had 300-to-1 odds. I am very happy that kids these days have no idea, but they very profoundly have no idea.
Humanist interested in the consequences of the machine on intellectual history.