* foreign intervention in afghanistan (if you're doing it for moral reasons, why not effective altruism global health & development instead? geopolitical reasons are ~meh, afghanistan seems just not _that_ interesting geopolitically (very poor, only mediocre amount of resources, maybe interesting because near China & Russia), perhaps you're training your military/funding the military-industrial complex? but even if Keynesianism is true, can't you just destroy a lot of goods instead of killing
* both YIMBYism *and* NIMBYism – many people have very strong feelings about this, but I don't feel like I actually understand them deeply enough (even though YIMBYism makes prima facie a bit more sense – of course you want more houses where people want more houses!). But I haven't thought this through at all.
people?)