@theresnotime alles auf Deutsch 👍
Economic policy checklist
@faho love the little fungi
Mycota gang
@sj but the bet offer was geniune
@sj I will probably not do that, since it doesn't feel like it passes my relevance threshold. I acknowledge that this is a bit of a dick move (to criticize a paper based on the abstract and then refusing to give a detailed critique).
Best thing I might do is to argue against the decomposition approach in forecasting and try to find evaluations of it, I have the intuition it's either not been investigated or shown to be biased downwards
@sj their 2043 claim
@sj I'd be willing to bet against their claim at 50:1 odds. Their methodology is likely broken, and I will try to figure out whether there is any scientific support for this kind of question decomposition
@RadicalEdward david please take a walk
@chjara Math doesn't use runes enough
And Tamil script
There are Pareto worsenings: you make everyone worse off by their standards. But are there Kaldor-Hicks worsenings?
The naive version (everyone is worse off, and there is no way of making a single person better off through distribution) doesn't work: you can always push a guy into huge debt and make everyone else super happy
Perhaps we just negate: everyone is worse off and there is no way of making everyone better off through distribution.
@Paradox Yeah :-/
@Paradox The one that makes things extremely better
I mean the other kinds would also be interesting, but not as hopeful
Although if someone could explain black hole geometry in poetry I'd celebrate that
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].