@Paradox of the word, I mean
Sometimes I come up with these words and then check whether anyone else thought of ot, on this case someone has
@Paradox one other occurrence on the internet
We already had the wave of physicists, we are still waiting on the shoe to drop on topologists, but THE WAVE OF CRYPTOGRAPHERS INTO NEUROSCIENCE is the single most promising thing that i can imagine for the discipline. I have been wailing about this for years, but if as a neuroscientist prof you were to go to attend the cryptography 101 seminar at your university, you would be LITERALLY ON FIRE with good ideas and one million obvious experiments that should be done.
i sorta "give away free research agendas" as a way to survive in academia and the one i wish most someone would pick up on is NEUROSCIENTISTS COLLABORATE WITH CRYPTOGRAPHERS so they would hire me.
reading @ansuz : https://social.cryptography.dog/@ansuz/113016394007280267
#neuroscience #cryptography #interdisciplinary #transdisciplinary #disciplinesAreFakeAnyway #ItWouldBeSickToBeInTheNeuroHackerLab #NeuroHackerLab #SomeoneWhoIsGoodAtDoingGrantStuffMakeTheNeuroHackerLab #ICantDoThatPartButICanDoTheOtherStuff
@Paradox how's yours?
@Paradox pretty good 😏
@kon german: posteo
@monsoon0 www.dcode.fr/primality-test
@lain there is a blogpost series about this
@Paradox good Q! Best option I know is kill on the first try
Otherwise 🤷
@Paradox hah, nice
I guess people could argue SGD is strong enough to just remove all deception in the first pass when it's still weak
@Paradox am I being subtooted :-D
@Paradox you're selecting both against the behavior *and* against your ability to detect/effectively deinforce the behavior
Similar to antibiotics resistant bacteria, where we select against bacteria and against our ability to defeat bacteria
@Paradox this one ^ i endorse far more
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].