@rime Awwww
😌
To be clear (contrary? to my previous reply) I don't really think the market for altruism is efficient yet, and will not be so for quite a while
Transfer from high to very high to extremely high utility projects—no idea
When I look back the backchainers didn't do very much cool stuff (?)
Weirdly many good things come from stumbling & sweat (Haber-Bosch process, electricity, reducing biomes…)
@rime I don't know whether I buy this :-)
Like, yes, good tech brought into the world only needs to be brought into the world once, but then one needs *maintenance*.
"We know how to kill Moloch, but it's not glorious, just tedious."
See also Ostroms work on Governing the Commons
@rime
There's levels to this! If we have a decreasing marginal returns model & weakly efficient market for altruism (vis à vis EA) we get a bunch of difficult but useless problems + few medium — difficult useful problems
But one can also be good along some axis, e.g. being able to deal with boring/tedious/stupid/low-status stuff that has high leverage
And then there's also problems which, if solved, unlock many low-hanging fruits cascadically
@rime Yes! It's surprising this works at all, but it does sometimes
Sexuality, *probably* weird racial role-playing, racism, internalized racism
I found one of the stranger websites today https://inferiorasian.com/
@a @internetarchive "self-destructing paper" :-(
@rime Also hi shell-chan! ~^^~
@rime "asl" → ask, was typing on my phone
SE is software engineering
@Paradox "Mr Bond, I have triangulated your data source"
@Paradox There's https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/quantitativity but not https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/quantitavity, but that kind of thing has never stopped me
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].