(Un?)related point: take the winners of the first decade review (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/s/HSA8wsaYiqdt4ouNF):
7 of them are "fluffy" posts, a lot more concerned with the vibe of EA. this feels — lacking, in some way? maybe a bit too much?
there's definitely a thing going on there which was definitely lw/forecasting influenced, these very small thought patterns
reading thousands of blogposts on this does increase your depth, imperceptibly at first
@nyx@social.xenofem.me startup idea: rent a factory and blow it the fuck up
with resolving inconsistent graph preferences, does the portion of non-uniquely resolvable preferences shrink with the number of options? in other words: for the set 𝓖_n of all graphs with n nodes, and the set U(𝓖_n) of those graphs with a unique path-graph with a smallest graph-edit distance, is |U(𝓖_n)|/𝓖_n<|U(𝓖_{n+1})|/|𝓖_{n+1}|?
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].