oofed not in the absurdle word list, even though it's the reaction i have the most when playing it
spicy wheat found
qream, neither is warez
boxem, foofe, bouge, mozed, janus, jarns, ezafu, jokez, foqed, naxus, extra spicy bunns
i dislike the way most people deal with QRI stuff
sure, they're kind of out there, man, but i'd like it if people were critiquing individual points
e.g. my opinions
* stv is ~correct: 10%
* log scales of pain & pleasure is correct: 85%
* this has huge implications: 65%
* neural annealing is a good framework for the brain: 50%
* neural annealing is correct, in all of the aspects they say: 1% (come on! it's a *huge* conjunction!)
* tyranny of intentional object is right: 90%
Wake up babe new bostrom draft just dropped!
Taxxon just casually drops a 1½ hour album
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5w6_D-jrt6s
it's a good day i might say
wait, is CIRL incorrigible *for the same reason* that utility-maximizers don't wirehead?
https://niplav.github.io/notes.html#An-Example-for-Not-Updating-Uncertain-Utility-Functions
“The problem with Marcus' argument is that the only alternative to statistical AI is spiritual AI“ no what the fuck why would you say this did you even read the sequences i don't even know where to start with that
holy fuck were ACX comments always this bad? most of them are fucking atrocious. like, barely tolerable.
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].