Show newer

it's not fair that roko was right about effective altruism

it's just not fair

niplav boosted

I have since tried to adopt my colleague's habit of tempering pure optimism with a sincere effort to locate counterexamples. Even if the result is true and counterexamples do not exist, these efforts often "map out the negative space" and leave a lot of clues as to how the proof of the positive result has to proceed, for instance by directly identifying the most dangerous putative counterexample scenarios and suggesting what the right "weapons" are to defeat them. 5/5

Show thread
niplav boosted

Astrology also encounters notable discontinuities when passing from one star sign to the next: a pair of twins, one born a minute before midnight at the end of one star sign period, and one born a minute after, would have significantly different horoscopes; similarly if they were born on opposite sides of a border between time zones (or better yet, the international date line). (2/2)

Show thread
niplav boosted

it's between me and god, and i'm not sure He wants any part in this

i am objectlevelmaxxing. i am cutthroughthebullshitpilled. i am in my simulacrum 0 arc. living the hugquerycore

Show thread
niplav boosted

My literal advice to anyone is to find the biggest, densest, most scholarly book that interests you and read it cover-to-cover. Take as much time as you could possibly need. Get to know it intimately, so much that you can explain the logic of its internal structure, terminological choices, etc. Then try to identify the book that that book's author read, or argued against, and repeat. Take as much time as you need. Your quality of intellectual life will skyrocket.

Show thread

solomonoff induction but with sophistication

niplav boosted

I remember Richard Ngo making the suggestion that the science of the interactions between individual humans is going to end up being similar to economics:

The main claim was that human interaction can be modeled as ongoing microtransactions of status.

E.g. take boasting: it's a sort of staking/investment/prediction in the status of a thing associated with a person, the harder the boast the bigger the "staking". Others can either join in (add stake) or in a grou you can then have a KBC-ish thin

Nuclear powerplants that float on the ocean so that when they melt down you can transport them away from the coast quickly and sink them in the ocean

right foundations

do you believe economics comes to conclusions that are more right/left wing? are you right/left wing politically?

is paul atreides a villain?

Show thread

is leto atreides a villain?

niplav boosted

in the alternate universe where we took the biopunk tech tree option, “chinchilla scaling” is way cooler

niplav boosted

If there was an account that was “animals that go hard” I would be one of them

Show thread

71f453558de50865fb6feec836f4ed868542664afac639bc070304259418bc52

niplav boosted
it sucks that the English cannot distinguish Schloss, Burg, Feste, Herrenhaus and Rittergut.

implementing Augmented Lagrangian because you want to: cozy, relaxed

implementing Augmented Lagrangian because your degree requires it: nausea-inducing, terminal ugh-field

doing it anyway in a 3 hour haze of nicotine-fueled parameter-tuning: self-transcending, supremely agentic

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one