I operate by Crocker's rules[1].
[1]: https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/crockers-rules
anyone have a lobste.rs invite
i want
aw they changed it
Oh wow this list is rad: https://arep.med.harvard.edu/gmc/protect.html
vote / bet on values / beliefs
a bit sad :-/
I now remember why I stopped doing as many forecasts: Everything was so confounded by AGI soon
Interpretability research is a thing that is both useful and academia would be very good at it.
Also you probably don't need moleFLOP computers to do it.
YES the AfD for Harberger tax article didn't go through[1]!
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Harberger_Tax
be empty of that too
fiction story about a species where females disguise as males for procreation to steal metabolically difficult to produce eggs from other females
They're STILL releasing new versions of the AmigaOS‽
i heard that you can summon a particular LessWronger by saying “The Categories Were Made For Man, Not Man For The Categories” three times in front of a mirror
AI arms race is more akin to a winners curse than a prisoner's dilemma
Things I regret having spent as much time on:
• Reading classical philosophy (exceptions exist)• Learning languages
Things I don't regret:
• Having learned coding• Having done forecasting• Reading STEM non-fiction
☺️
Does OpenAI still publish interpretability research?
a tensor is just an element in the tensor product of vector spaces and their duals, what's the problem?
(Non-joke question) Is there a tensor product of tensor products
Strong kudos to Jaron Lanier for forseeing the current discourse on generative model. My respect has increased.
a Schelling point for those who seek one