Show newer

“…and we can probably plan for middle of March thi…ah, hello! Mister Yudkowsky! I hope you found—”
“Rename your company to ClosedAI.”
“Uh…what?”
“Rename your company to ClosedAI. Stop your biggest training
runs. Pivot to mechanistic interpretability. Shut it all down.”
“………Selfie?”

Utility is linear in probability but nothing else.

After discovering that this would be a pain to port over I won't do it.

Show thread
niplav boosted
niplav boosted

It would be funny if coherence would depend on pretty galaxy-brained math such as Hodge/Helmholtz decomposition

niplav boosted

anybody got an invite to coloroftelevisiontunedtoadeadchannel skies, I heard it's the same as here but only cool people are allowed

Publish this to LessWrong?

Show thread

In a similar fashion, rare nodes central in a semantic network (such as domain names for very common words) have only value due to their connections to other nodes nearby.

Corollary: Land-value tax would make far less sense in a hyperbolic space: It's really easy to get from one point to another quickly.

Natural resources consumption taxes might still be worth it.

Show thread

Land-Value Tax seems roughly right to me, but I feel like they could be generalized to graph-centrality taxes:

It's not that we don't have enough land, but the value of land is really dependent on how valuable the land around it is (in a fashion similar to the value of networks in Metcalfe's law[1]).

So establishing the value of land is a kind of coordination game, in which people try to eke out centers of valuable land.

[1]: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metcalfe

Capabilities idea: 9b853b32ec0e742a0978f7999278326ba8138b55

They figured out they wouldn't be able to create alignment in time and therefore chose noble civilizational decline in hopes of future civilizations picking up the task

i mean how many bits can you even hide in a human-understandable theorem?

meditation has the effect of “conceptual regularization” for me: less discrete thinking, and more conservative concept boundaries

evolution lets animals age because otherwise they fall into procrastination type paradox situations

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one