niplav @niplav@schelling.pt

These days I spent way more time on Wikipedia than anywhere else tbh

ghastly incentives! horrid incentives!

Mate-poaching is a thing because it makes use of information asymmetry: why do all the mate-evaluation work yourself when you can just let someone else do it?

position, velocity, acceleration, jerk, snap, crackle, pop, …lurch?

Plotinian theory of ›better is realer‹ equivalent to STV+UDASSA (more symmetry makes you easier to locate in the universal prior)

woman told me of a dream she had where she saw a man having sex with another woman, taking over and “being better than her”.

first time i've heard of competitive ranked sex in the real world

I should've read more history and less philosophy

i am normal and can be trusted on your internet forum

anyone have a lobste.rs invite

i want

aw they changed it

Oh wow this list is rad: https://arep.med.harvard.edu/gmc/protect.html

vote / bet on values / beliefs

a bit sad :-/

I now remember why I stopped doing as many forecasts: Everything was so confounded by AGI soon

Interpretability research is a thing that is both useful and academia would be very good at it.

Also you probably don't need moleFLOP computers to do it.

YES the AfD for Harberger tax article didn't go through[1]!

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Harberger_Tax

be empty of that too