Disappointed that [1] doesn't actually check for common vNM violations. This must be assuaged
[1]: https://sohl-dickstein.github.io/2023/03/09/coherence.html
How much counterfactually available outcome-value is left on the table by Hansonian instincts?
I.e. you have a community that tries to achieve X, but they don't achieve X as well as they could because of social status drives. How much better could they achieve X if they didn't have those drives (at same level of intelligence)
Either phrase things clearly with "should" or "ethically", or speak purely in "if X, then Y" or "Z will happen".
Wasn't Carcinisation[1] such a blog?
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].