I operate by Crocker's rules[1].
[1]: https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/crockers-rules
Classification of simple finite pre-agents
{fuzzy, util} × {terminal, instrumental}
Should i try to meet gwern in person?
Every hardcore rat needs to have a soft streak for a specific type of mysticism
But the mystiscisms are MECE
"I don't make the rules, I just enforce them" as well
"guns don't kill people, people kill people" is wireheading
Invitation to a retreat in a czech castle: ✓
Is gamer girl bath water vegan
Extremely wide concept boundary around "punditry", tinged with negative emotional valence
Punishing people for making clear predictions in a coalitional conflict by using the incorrect statements cherrypickedly destroys epistemic legibility commons.
We're making the most powerful artifacts ever created in human history, and we do not understand how they work.
Shortest AI doom argument that feels sufficient for worry to me.
TESCREAL∩open source surprisingly small: Peter Eckersley and...?
CONTEMPLATING HEMISPHERECTOMIES TO PURIFY THEIR NASCENT IDEALISM ON THE VERGE OF A HOPE-ASH LONDON DAWN
No more conferences
Only longsite
Effective emptiness
Do not ask: What can I do for less wrong, ask: What can lesswrong do for me?
@TetraspaceGrouping maybe
Fediverse at EAG meetup: meeting point 5 sunday at 13:00.
Codephrase is "i like your shoelaces"
Bijective functionalism
a Schelling point for those who seek one