this conclusion is desirable for the reason that it provides an excellent foundation for all sorts of rhetorical trickery; in the Soviet case, it was used to justify the state ideology, lending air cover to its failing policies (see Stalin famines)

if people are infinitely moldable, then their outcomes are entirely a function of their environment; in this sense, Lysenkoism is a more ideological form of Lamarckism; used, as such, to justify a sort of socioeconomic epigenetics

i think you can see where i'm going w/ this

CRT leverages blank-slatism precisely for this socioeconomic epigenetic argument structure; rather than being caused by any sort of inherent differences, all divergent outcomes can instead be attributed to outside factors, namely intersections of oppression, systemic injustices

like Stalin's USSR, the American woke, the baizou, started from a set of political goals (reparations, full equity, abolishment of extant power structures), influenced by pre-existing ideological currents, then adopted & subverted the ideology to prop up their goals' validity

given this ideological structure, it is instrumental to their movement to deny the existence of inconvenient underlying biological truths, as they undermine the foundations of their arguments

this is why we must make it maximally difficult to deny reality; don't let them do this