this often escapes notice, that glasses are a cyborg enhancement of the body; using technology to transcend the limitations of our genetic heritage, to become more than we are. what could be more transhumanist?
---
RT @mattparlmer
I've been a staunch supporter of cyborg posthumanism since the first time I put glasses on
https://twitter.com/mattparlmer/status/1426586257472249862
there are many such attitudes one could adopt; do you go full bioessentialist, as many on the political extremes have, worshipkng the natural form as divine? do you reject the accoutrements of technological civilization & eschew glasses/hearing aids?
---
RT @pee_zombie
there is a type of bioessentialist luddite which resists any sort of cyborgization, ie integration of tools into the extended self; they push for a sort of RETVRN of th…
https://twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/1396662991832109057
there are myriad positions in between and orthogonal to these, ofc, but most I see in practice tend to cluster around one of these three.
personally I'm a mix of the latter two; more radical than most, but more conservative than many, varying by topic
---
RT @pee_zombie
to be a proper transhumanist you need to be HIGHLY conservative in certain domains; preserving a healthy mind until uploading is possible should be our foremost goal, …
https://twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/1381424502752612353
you may find the claim that donning glasses makes one a cyborg a bit absurd, but let me assure you it squares with the traditional definition. if this bothers you, perhaps use it as an impetus to reevaluate your notions of what a human is & ought to be; you may find it worthwhile