the upside to this approach is that "deviants", ie those that differ from various norms in some way, do in fact tend to be more likely to be dangerous in some way; tribalism and conservatism are powerful tools for avoiding danger, and we feel them strongly bc they kept us alive
this applies to both individuals & collectives, unsurprisingly, as an individual itself is a collective of psychological subcomponents
any agent wishing to remain a live player should continuously balance the competing impulses of openness & distrust
---
RT @pee_zombie
the function of your primary ideological frame should be to ensure psychic ergodicity, avoiding memetic calcification and maintaining metacognitive optionality; this is…
https://twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/1398735589525098505
the downside is, ofc, that too much of this limits one's ability to respond to new situations; cognitive flexibility is critical when encountering heretofore unknown challenges, ones which the traditional and trusted ways are not equipped to handle.