the interesting part is that a "properly practiced" EY rationalism is pretty equivalent to an explicitly steelmanned postrationalism

this is bc most people, even in the rat community, are not very good at thinking clearly, and get too dogmatic about rationalist principles
---
RT @eigenrobot
yud griping about the existence of postrationality every few months is a W for us

"what even is postrationality what does this even mean"

eliezer…
https://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1462141498909093888

the "hidden community of rats" EY is talking about is this vast iceberg of people who have read rat writing, liked it, have tried to apply it in their own lives (poorly), suffered for it, and then abandoned it (wisely), decrying rationalism in the process (unwisely)

they're real

you don't see them bc they're by definition on the fringes as they don't produce original rat thought or writing, hence are more or less invisible

many of these people find "postrationalism" more palatable bc its structure lends itself much better to being applied by most people

you don't need to understand Bayesian reasoning or wtf a prior is, you can just follow the vibes

game theory? nah man just don't be a dick and let people live

isn't AI risk kind of dorky? and AGI probably isn't real anyway, let's focus on trauma instead

if one were to attempt to distill and rigorously define the principles of postrationalism (do not do this, very unwise), I'm fairly confident they'd turn out to be intuitionistic versions of many preexisting rat principles

just, you know, easier to understand and apply