Show newer

claiming that one might only dislike a certain thing if they're a deeply broken person is not very cozy

feeding the drama fire is not very cozy

making unrelated people the butt of your clique's joke is not very cozy

not having the courage of your convictions is not very cozy

the opportunity for self-transcendence is present in ever banal moment

---
RT @pee_zombie
zen practitioners understand that the goal of practicing a zen art is simultaneously in the perception of the practice, and the pathway to the transcendent that opens up through the practice

passion and self-actualization is quite similar in structure twitter.com/nosilverv/status/1
twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/

Show thread

stepping into ur power by becoming ur own senpai is the only path to self-actualization; realizing that no one but urself is capable of giving you permission to embody ur divine aspect, releases u from seeking external validation
---
RT @visakanv
I’ve been thinking about this re: the idea of “royal touch”. People still do this today with celebrities, hoping senpai will notice them twitter.com/aella_girl/status/
twitter.com/visakanv/status/14

the epistemic landscape is highly adversarial and must be traversed with a defensive posture

---
RT @deepfates
If you're comfortable applying a critique of objectivity to your beliefs, comfortable with the possibility they might be negated, then we can talk magic.

If your beliefs are too fragile or previous to be investigated, they're sus
twitter.com/deepfates/status/1

Show thread

the way people form themselves into alliances historically shifts from physical proximity, to memetic proximity, to epistemic proximity; each reorganizes people along different lines & enables new coordinative affordances

how you know things matters

---
RT @pee_zombie
epistemic alignment, not object-level belief or even axiomatic or values alignment, is the strongest indicator of long-term interpersonal compatibility

"how you go abou…
twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/

Show thread

this conflict is the core problem driving the historical dialectic of epistemic architecture;

the centralization into modernism, the intensification of high modernism, the subsequent collapse into post-modernism, & the various currently competing heirs

---
RT @pee_zombie
cynicism aside, the collapse of high modernism into PM has many parallels, such as the negation of the "end of science" by blackbody radiation & relativity

the spli…
twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/

Show thread

the difference in requisite approach per context is the root of this conflict; unless one is explicit about which context they're making truth claims within, everyone hears something different

epistemic consensus is necessary for productive collaboration; science gets this right

Show thread

a context can be:
0. an ephemeral self-concept
1. your time-coherent higher self
2. the social reality of some group
3. some slice of physical reality
4. the entirety of the universe (?)

the appropriate level of epistemic rigor varies greatly across these contextual tiers

Show thread

a belief is true if it has utility within some bounded context; the tricky parts are in
1. where to draw the contextual bounds
2. how to produce an absolute truth value

the problem is that reality can be gerrymandered to make any belief useful, & its unclear how to rank contexts
---
RT @Aella_Girl
just cause something is an ancient tradition practiced over hundreds of years by smart people does *not* mean it's right
it's not very hard …
twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/

they project a friendly persona custom-designed to appeal to one's preferences, and when granted trust, exploit the relationship for their own gain, effectively operating as a parasite

keep this in mind when being friendly w/ internet personas; how much should you trust them?

Show thread

some malware functions by presenting an informational surface conforming to a system's expectations for a good-faith counterparty & upon being accepted into the high-trust circle within the system boundary, abusing its privileges to extract value

certain people are like this too

breathing space into the gap between stimulus and response is the first step on the path to self transcendence
---
RT @nosilverv
If you can conquer space between craving and acting on the craving then you can hold the craving and start investigating it, its qualities, what it is like, whats like to hold it or let it go or go into it, what it does, …
twitter.com/nosilverv/status/1

zen practitioners understand that the goal of practicing a zen art is simultaneously in the perception of the practice, and the pathway to the transcendent that opens up through the practice

passion and self-actualization is quite similar in structure
---
RT @nosilverv
This is literally the actualization of @jordanbpeterson’s message
twitter.com/nosilverv/status/1

particularly this part is especially important to me, the metacognitive skill necessary to delineate epistemic contexts. I don't think I could ever trust someone who can't do this, and engages with risky beliefs

---
RT @Aella_Girl
When I'm around people where I feel comfortable they know how to keep their frames separate, where understanding of physics remains intact, then I personally feel comfortable talking and interacting in very m…
twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/

Show thread

basically identical to my own position; astrology as metaphysics? gunna back away slowly. astrology as divination technique/fun social game? ok we can hang!
---
RT @Aella_Girl
I unapologetically view people who literally believe the stars/planets can predict unrelated things on earth as uniquely bad at thinking (moreso than many other strange beliefs)
But if you don't literally believe this, then astrology seems like it could be really …
twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/

Schelling point identification test
---
RT @nosilverv
Choose the one that has been chosen the most
twitter.com/nosilverv/status/1

PSA never meet your mutuals

interacting IRL will provide way too many data points, allowing them to simulate you in sufficient detail to craft painfully accurate burns

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one