Ah yes, the good old "we tried chopping up the data many ways to find a specific three-way-interaction we had in mind". You love to see it in 2023.
@rubenarslan
@lakens @shuhbillskee
Sorry, I'm not following. What am I missing?
The obvious "we wanted to find the IA, it wasn't there, so we tossed and turned the data again and again" aside, they do eventually conclude _no_ interaction and instead admit to the overall effect.
@GeorgKrammer @lakens @shuhbillskee if that's their modus operandi, how much do you trust the couple of other interactions they report in the same blog post?
@GeorgKrammer @rubenarslan @lakens I can assure you these specific authors have a long history of not innocently exploring data in popular and academic writing. If you're curious about the specific I'd start with:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1
Have a nice day. 🙂
@rubenarslan @lakens @shuhbillskee
Oh ok, just a #blog ...
#NoSource in original post :( only a pic of someone writing they tried finding something and eventually giving up. Could've even been purely #explorative
Who knows?
#Trust something on the #internet ? Oh come now... ofc DON'T! 😁
That's not new in 2023.
And always remember our good friend #xkcd
https://xkcd.com/386/