Garry Kasparov can't exist. Whenever I ask people what chess moves he would make, they just smooth it over with a vague and magical "one that's good"; the only time someone deigned to give an actual theory of how he'd win, it was a long conjunctive string of moves and coutermoves that I could have easily completely invalidated just by making a different move earlier in the game. Clearly it's just the delusion of someone who's watched too much Queen's Gambit.