the issue is that, depending on the optimization landscape, it might take more energy to arrive at a better maxima than would make the improvement worthwhile; this is why one must take the specifics of their objective function and properties of their landscape into account
there've been many attempts to model & simulate the logic of these organisms, w/ v promising results; long been fascinated by them, & greatly enjoy reading papers like these. the natural world is full of more wonders than we know
https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0423
---
RT @pee_zombie
slime molds are efficient biological 2-space minimum flow cost solvers and thats fuckin dope #slimemoldtwitter https://twitter.com/embryosophy/status/1340367…
https://twitter.com/pee_zombie/status/1342197082598334464
@pee_zombie nice thread! I'm interested in intuitions about hight-dimensional differentiable spaces: I've heard both that they contain a lot of local maxima, and that the contain no local maxima (the intuition there being that there's just too many dimensions for there being none to escape through (S)GD)
early on in the exploration phase, it is typically advantageous to optimize for optionality, investing energy into creating more possible search avenues, keeping many options open while one searches for higher maxima; this strategy is generally called breadth-first search