niplav @niplav@schelling.pt

Alignment is *obviously* solvable

why do people keep claiming it isn't

@gigabecquerel <UNTRANSLATABLE>

@galena LEM states that not not X is the same as X

So not accepting the LEM means that punkpunk isn't just normiedom

@galena law of excluded middle doesn't hold here

haro in Esperanto means “single hair”. “hararo“ maeans “collection of many hairs“. “harari” is the corresponding verb.

wait WHY is “book” “libro” in esperanto, but “library” is *not* “libraro” but “biblioteko”? Huh???

ugh I hate it I am allied with people who propose the clipper chip but for GPUs

maybe for good reason but man I dislike the aesthetic and will continue to only do technical stuff

von Neumann and Morgenstern are a joy to read :-D

Surely nobody has ever gerrymandered a concept

If all of humanity had made it the central focus to figure out quantum physics in 1910 before 1915, would they have been able to?

Once I believed that the paper Progress Measures for Grokking via Mechanistic Interpretability had found the network grokking onto the Schönhage-Strassen algorithm on the task of modular multiplication, not on modular addition around the circle

narcissism of small differences I guess

99.9% e/acc

@changeling Imagine imagining you're a person

@pujz @doubtshrine@stoat.zone @GreatDismal Easy nice

@timorl Huh. TIL

romanticide

Sending this to deletionist admins every day until they stop