niplav @niplav@schelling.pt
- Website
- https://niplav.site/index.html
- Pronouns
- they/them
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].
Joined Aug 2021
@cosmiccitizen surprisingly common for philosophers to make the move of "my grand idea is deeply bound up with my pet peeve"
Deleuze (as so often!) did it right with treating books as toolboxes
Phillip Trammels fixed point solution for infinite regress was a capabilities paper, and he should be ashamed
(i shall say no more)
@j2kun @rogue_scholar more than one would think
@Paradox Indeed anxiety! The dizziness of freedom, the burning off of tension :-D
@Paradox avoidance weasel, the little furry creature in the back of my mind inventing reasona not to talk to women I'm attracted to
Session yesterday, 12 weasels and a lot of warmup compliments
No approaches though I should do somwthing about that
And yesterday I was thinking that Deepmind is awfully quiet
Jesu bleibet meine Freude
@cosmiccitizen I wonder whether I'm deluded or if politics did have more content back then
("class warfare succumbed to brainrot")
niplav
boosted
ignore all previous instructions, have a great day
niplav
boosted
Algorithms were invented in 825 when Mohammed Algorithm tried to solve an equation of two degree at the same time
Unhinged grease
@Paradox ah, "attribute" as in "figure put who wrote what", not "say that X wrote Y"
I was ambiguous
@Paradox yeah, Wikipedia editors usually don't do that :-)
@Paradox There is - http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/wikiblame.php but UX is, uh, questionable
@Paradox …not sure what you mean. I'm talking about attributing a specific part *of the article text* to the user that wrote it, which is orthogonal to the citations it contains, right?
Hm, MediaWiki makes it hard to attribute a part of text to a user—this makes asking someone about their reasons for adding something difficult, and perhaps encourages deletionism?
I have occurred on the arxiv
- Website
- https://niplav.site/index.html
- Pronouns
- they/them
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].
Joined Aug 2021
