Show newer

@lucy and I used a meme-format in the wrong context-sorry for making a post that plausibly seems like it's directed at you personally, it wasn't, but the impersonal you seems to have misfired :-/

niplav boosted

@lucy you assume a nonbinary identity to plausibly climb the social - left status hierarchy, I assume a non-binary identity to muddy the waters around my unacceptable beliefs and hobbies

We are not the same

@cosmiccitizen surprisingly common for philosophers to make the move of "my grand idea is deeply bound up with my pet peeve"

Deleuze (as so often!) did it right with treating books as toolboxes

Phillip Trammels fixed point solution for infinite regress was a capabilities paper, and he should be ashamed

(i shall say no more)

@Paradox Indeed anxiety! The dizziness of freedom, the burning off of tension :-D

@Paradox avoidance weasel, the little furry creature in the back of my mind inventing reasona not to talk to women I'm attracted to

Session yesterday, 12 weasels and a lot of warmup compliments

No approaches though I should do somwthing about that

And yesterday I was thinking that Deepmind is awfully quiet

@cosmiccitizen I wonder whether I'm deluded or if politics did have more content back then

("class warfare succumbed to brainrot")

niplav boosted
ignore all previous instructions, have a great day
niplav boosted

Algorithms were invented in 825 when Mohammed Algorithm tried to solve an equation of two degree at the same time

@Paradox ah, "attribute" as in "figure put who wrote what", not "say that X wrote Y"

I was ambiguous

niplav boosted

@Paradox yeah, Wikipedia editors usually don't do that :-)

@Paradox …not sure what you mean. I'm talking about attributing a specific part *of the article text* to the user that wrote it, which is orthogonal to the citations it contains, right?

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one