OK here's a model for this
You approach with ~outcome independence
She feels that, and the approach is executed good-ish, so she has some attraction
But forebrain says no bc of existing relationship
She is afraid of bad reaction on rejection
She rejects and I stay cool and maybe make a relaxed joke
That makes her more attracted and more relaxed bc she knows I'm not a threat, and it's "OK" to touch bc I already committed to the no
I wonder how accurate this is?
Hm one is dead bits the other one doesn't live here and also the approach ended badly
Mere ripples
I've made a deliberate choice against a quoting feature because it inevitably adds toxicity to people's behaviours. You are tempted to quote when you should be replying, and so you speak at your audience instead of with the person you are talking to. It becomes performative. Even when doing it for "good" like ridiculing awful comments, you are giving awful comments more eyeballs that way. No quote toots. Thank's
GUYS NEW SI PREFIXES JUST DROPPED THERE ARE CANON SI PREFIXES FOR 10^27 AND 10^30 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03747-9
Ik gıhorta dat ſeggen
dat ſih urhettun ænon muotın
hıltıbrant entı hadubrant untar herıun tuem
ſunu fatarungo ıro ſaro rıhtun
garutun ſe ıro gudhamun gurtun ſih ıro ſuert ana
carry a big stick and don't be afraid to use it
There are new SI prefixes that would be cool enby names.
Ronna (1027), ronto (10-27), quetta (1030), and quecto (10-30).
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].