Substances for meditation enhancement are a 2×2, {low substance, high substance}×{low meditation, high meditation}.
High substance has problems: Insights don't stick/are vacuous, + dangerous
High meditation has opportunity costs: Learning rate and energy parameter are too low
Low substance and low meditation are just less effective modulo relaxation effects
But where is the pareto frontier?
I am *not* convinced by the evidence for multiplicative decomposition in judgmental forecasting[1]
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YjZ8sJmkGJQhNcjHj/the-evidence-for-question-decomposition-is-weak
Arbitrary X aren't Y can mean:
* All X aren't Y
* Almost all X arent Y (real numbers, computable)
* Many X aren't Y, some are, and the two groups are hard to disentangle (SAT problems, sovable in polynomial time)
* Few X aren't Y, but we haven't found a way to distinguish the ones who are from the ones who aren't, and can generate arbitrary X that aren't Y (violations of strategy-freeness in voting theory)
* Almost no X are Y, but same situation as above (don't know example)
Out of all the things EY is wrong about, they[1] picked… p-zombies, decision theory and animal moral patienthood as central examples‽
Come on! There's so much better stuff
In search of a Greater Ury[1]
I operate by Crocker's rules[1].