this exchange is fascinating bc neither side cares about abstract principles; the left about decency or precaution, the right about liberty or the role of morality. they're engaged in a purely political battle, seeking to use the legal system to advocate for object-level goals
---
RT @realJohnDouglas
Yes. You have founded us. The secret is out.
https://twitter.com/realJohnDouglas/status/1467917703155441665
@pee_zombie however, in what way does the right see *caution* as degeneracy? I don't think that's the right word
@pee_zombie I was pretty disappointed by my (and other's) reaction to the SSC NYT affair last year, I definitely didn't have my tribal instinct under control there (I was able to prevent myself from posting about it online, though)
Gray tribe is better, sure, but tsuyoku naritai
@pee_zombie hm, at the limit I would want to prevent others from committing moral atrocities, e.g preventing people who don't know any better from eating a Carolina reaper
But I reckon this judgment should come after some derliberation
can those on the left truly not understand why many would find this repugnant, how their impulse is rooted in concern for children's health and future?
do those on the right not realize how finding something morally abhorrent does not justify preventing others from doing it?