Show newer

This leads to political correctness and self-censorship.
This form of censorship is particularly insidious because it is invisible - we don't see books banned that never get written.

Show thread

2. More importantly, they're disincentivizing the production of anything that might be seen as controversial b/c publishers have to fear losing a major revenue stream. As A. decides this at will, there is no certainty re this. So better safe than sorry.

Show thread

- Amazon is not just "a private company, they can do whatever they want". They have too much market power for that. ("with great power...")
- Due to their market power, banning books has two implications:
1. They're making these books less visible & harder to get today.

Show thread

To clarify:
- The idea that being LGBTQ+ is a mental illness is idiotic & not helpful to society.
- But that someone who has this opinion is prevented from stating it publicly is deeply concerning.
- Especially when a private corp decides the bounds of discourse.

Show thread

@goldengatekeeper yeah totally, just make it an online tool. Perhaps not w/ real-time updates, though, not to make it look like a competition to some people. ;)

Request for research: use sentiment analysis to differentiate online harassment from criticism. Apply to twitter.

Allows us to understand when there really is a "smear campaign" vs sb painting themselves as a victim.

Seems pretty straightforward.

Productivity advice is premium mediocre.

...how it's going...
---
RT @dendricide
@deepfates dropping out of college to draw extremely racist pepe and groyper NFTs
twitter.com/dendricide/status/

No gods. No kings. Only memes.

- Such a missed opportunity!

Show thread

Twitter is so postmodern.
Some poor souls actually try to hold a discourse to get closer to the truth.
The real heros just throw cultural fragments at each other. - Ironically? - Does it matter?
No gods. No kings. Only men.

RT @jardinsecret88
What is the female version of “American Psycho”?

RT @harmonylion1
The hard part of “holding two opposing thoughts in mind at the same time” is holding two opposing emotions in the body at the same time.

RT @embryosophy
@chaosprime may they live to honor your sacrifice

RT @deepfates
ᴵ ᵈᵒᶰ'ᵗ ᵏᶰᵒʷ ʷʰᵒ ᶰᵉᵉᵈˢ ᵗᵒ ʰᵉᵃʳ ᵗʰᶤˢ˒ ᵇᵘᵗ ʸᵒᵘ ˢᵃᵗ ᵒᶰ ᵗʰᵉ ᵀʷᶤᵗᵗᵉʳ ʳᵉᵐᵒᵗᵉ ᵃᶰᵈ ᵗᵘʳᶰᵉᵈ ᵗʰᵉ ᵛᵒˡᵘᵐᵉ ᵃˡˡ ᵗʰᵉ ʷᵃʸ ᵈᵒʷᶰˑ ᶜᵃᶰ ʸᵒᵘ ʰᵉᵃʳ ᵗʰᶤˢ

Show older
Mastodon

a Schelling point for those who seek one