niplav @niplav@schelling.pt

holy hell wilhelm reich *was* based

interacted with einstein, shot down clouds, many affairs

@lain (didn't connect it with the previous post which made it funnier in connection with reich—"teenage sexual liberation" and all that)

@lain always has been

@animeirl nice

@ayegill The way I always understood the argument is that nanorobots have a path-dependency that makes them

1. much less likely to arise naturally
2. much more resilient/strong/effective

(the talk is often of diamondoid structures which are purportedly far more robust against attackers, but require much higher energies/precision to be created)

but then again the relevant literature mostly eludes me

@animeirl some things belong into the backend ane

@ciphergoth

I think there are better algebraic reasons for 0∈ℕ, see the 5th bullet point at https://niplav.github.io/mathematics_notation_convention.html

79893 minutes of meditation until now

Gatekeep girlboss gaslight givewell

I hope

@axiS yes

@axiS
Conclusion: I can do whatever I wanted to do anyway, but now I can also feel smug about it

I would be surprised if adversarial examples for LLMs were also adversarial examples for humans